While the actual definition of chemistry, its components, and its manifestations are fairly vague, this is a well documented concept.Some people describe chemistry in metaphorical terms, such as "like cookie dough and vanilla ice cream", or "like a performance".Well it's certainly great to be back here on the forums!
When people – usually guys – talk about “the thrill of the chase” in dating, they’re talking about the lead up to the “conquest”, the heady feeling of inevitability that grows like an orgasm to a crescendo before you reach the point of no return.It can be described in the terms of mutual feelings - "a connection, a bond or common feeling between two people", or as a chemical process - "[it] stimulates love or sexual attraction...brain chemicals are definitely involved".While chemistry has been described as "that romantic spark between [two people]", the term "spark" in the context of relationships is as vague as "chemistry", and therefore is not particularly useful in a definition. D., suggests that "not everyone experiences chemistry".The problem is that because we have such a hard time explaining chemistry it takes on the level of myth – chemistry is just there or it isn’t. The closer you get to actually getting it but without actually being able to achieve it causes the desire to grow.Which – brace yourselves, I’m about to blow your minds – is bullshit. Marketers know this, which is why they practice artificial scarcity – they’ll tell you “Call now, supplies are running out!